Find a Lawyer

SARFRAZ versus STATE

Arts 3 and 4 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 103 Law Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 43 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 203F (2B) Recovering Proof of 50kg Heroin Recovery Procedure Substitute for the accused. Police trial court recovered 50 kilograms of heroin from the accused's house in a raid, sentencing the accused to life imprisonment, which was retained by the Federal Shariat Court, was picked up by the suspects. All the recovery witnesses were police officers and the prosecution was not proven by the record because the prosecution A witness was not only a private witness but also a respected resident of the neighborhood who witnessed the heroin recovery and signed a recovery memo. The witnesses were rigorously examined and examined but nothing could be extracted from them. Er was proved a heroin because it was alleged that he had convicted the actual culprits, because so much It was not possible to misrepresent heroin in large quantities, given the testimony of witnesses. The police were officers because the reluctance to participate as a witness of the common people had become a judicially recognized fact, that no such restriction existed under Article 43 of the Law Evidence, 1984, that any official witness No sentence can be punished on the statement. To be dismissed only on the basis that he was a public witness or a policeman, the statement of the police witness can be relied upon if his testimony has not been somewhat corrupted during the investigation and any hostility. , Hate or anger family advocate from Feroz Walla lawyer