Find a Lawyer

ABDUL REHMAN versus DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CITY CIRCLE, SARGODHA

The High Court's jurisdiction under Section 561A & 155 (2) Panel Code (1860 of XLV), Sections 420, 468 and 471 Section 561A, accuses the FIR against the CCP Scope applicant / accused. The termination was that the nephew of the respondent / complainant was assigned the duties of the Manager of the Hotel of Respondent and the applicant imposed a fake court order regarding the change in the ownership of the defendant's land. On the record, the evidence was fully established that the petitioner had prepared a false, fake and fabricated order from the court. Section 12 (2), How to challenge the decree under the CPC and the criminal magistrate's charge against which it is charged cannot be investigated without the permission of the respondents / complainants only. The only remedy available was to challenge the order under section 12. 2) The CPC, withdrew, because the provisions of Section 12 (2), the CPC can only be invoked if an injunction has been obtained through fraud or misrepresentation, In the present case, according to the prosecution, there was no such order and even no case was filed in the court. The second argument is that a serious offense cannot be investigated without the permission of the magistrate; it also has no power, because where the case was Section 155 (2), the CRPC was not attracted and the police magistrate. Can investigate such a case without the permission of, a case was registered under Sections 420, 468 and 471, PPC, and so on. Sections 468 and 471, PPCs were non-serious, but Sections 420, p immigration advocates contact from Kech lawyer