MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus SURKHARU KHAN
Section 13 Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), O XLI, R 31, and Section 115 Lower Appellate Court Decision-Making Trial After Trial In Trial, Lower Appellate Court Rights I, without any evidence, was prosecuted. The matter was decided on the basis of the record, only the divorce agreement and the determination of the students, and the appeal filed by the shopkeepers was dismissed. Reasons for the law, since any leave can compromise the parties' valuable rights, the Lower Appellate Court did not care to evaluate or discuss the evidence presented or the evidence presented and without any evidence and judicial mind. Decided, therefore, on the benchmark O XLI, established in R 31 CPC, that the decision passed by the Lower Appellate Court was not sustainable in the re-use of the High Court, theoretical jurisdiction, passed by the lower appellate court. The decisions and decisions made were set aside and the decisions made by OXL Received further remand of his appeal, under which the CPC was allowed to be revised.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Gari Habibullah lawyer