Find a Lawyer

IKRAM UL HAQ versus STATE

There was no enmity against the accused for making false allegations to the complainant of section 7 (e) of the Complaints Code (XLV of 1860), section 365 Evidence. He was a resident of the same district where the victim was recovering. The trial against the accused has been proved by the trial court without evidence of any doubt, conviction and punishment. The accused has been sentenced to death. Was murdered and the murder was cited. To the extent that it was replied that the other accused were not present on the spot and it is also recorded on the record that he was looking for the deceased as well as Syed was the neighbor of the accused complainant. Was given and the sentence and sentence against him were set aside and he was released. The trial against all the other accomplices was suspicious because they did not recover the kidnapper and were tried by the trial court, and they were also released. A case has been registered against the driver of the car, which was not pressed by the complainant. He has been tried and convicted. He was set aside by the trial court and was released. property advocate from Sanghar lawyer