Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM THROUGH ATTORNEY versus STATE

The probability of fraud was eliminated by the appreciation of the evidence filed in section 2 302 (b) immediately, and the false impeachment of the accused motive for the incident was completely proved, witnesses practiced the incident. The evidence was not only credible and reliable, but also free from any dishonest exaggeration or improvement. Eyewitnesses have no enmity with the accused, confirming each other to prove that the victim had injured a screwdriver and a dagger in his presence. There was no room for the victim to say that in the absence of any hostility against the accused, the weapon used in the commission of the crime and the crime, in the absence of any medical evidence, corresponded to the eye. Had Recovery of the dagger from the account and the manner in which the prosecution's witnesses have stated that it is h is extremely impossible, but even if they were excluded from consideration of the other substantive independent evidence available on record. Not that the prosecution's case against the accused was sufficient to prove beyond reasonable doubt and that the death sentence of the accused was maintained under the circumstances. immigration advocates contact from Baroute lawyer