Section 399/402 Pakistan Arms Ordinance, (XX of 1965), Section 13 (d) Assemble for the purpose of committing a robbery; Definition of evidence Similar cases against the accused persons and accomplices were not proved that they were robbers. Were assembled on the side of the road armed with weapons and were identified by police headlights of a police vehicle. The accused under Section 999999 and 2 40 PP, PPC Validity Police did not disclose how the accused and the accomplices were known before them or were involved in other criminal cases. No independent evidence was collected from or around the site to prove that the accused and co-accused tried to stop a vehicle or rob a passenger when all the suspects were found guilty but did not prove it. That they stand together for the purpose of committing the robbery except for the bare words of the three witnesses of the prosecution, there is no other rational content. It was reported that the accused and the co-accused were together to commit the robbery statement of the accused. And the co-accused accused the police of being together to commit the robbery until they were brought before the trial court or there was no evidence to prove the charges against them. Was not enough to convict them. The prosecution was created to collect information about the history of the accused and the accomplices, and whether they were previously charged or arrested or convicted of similar offenses. Whether or not the prosecution by the court at trial
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
