Find a Lawyer

AMANAT ALI versus STATE

Definition of Section 302 (b) evidence was filed immediately without any further delay in mentioning the name of the accused as a special accused, who was involved as the accused. Eliminated the possibility of fabricating a false story. The single accused has not been identified as the main suspect as the co-accused, while all the injuries have been attributed to the accused. The accused was the complainant's next door neighbor for many years, who was cultivating his land in the same area and was known to him. There is no possibility of mismanagement of the accused in each other's case, and the arrest of the co-accused who had the benefit of the doubt properly, will not make the accused's case because even if the co-accused is acquitted of the complainant's case. He is closely related to both victims, but there was nothing in the record to refute his statement and to declare him as a witness of interest. The complainant suffered a cross examination successfully and seriously. The defense failed to gain anything from the actual culprit to establishing false accusations of the accused She was persistent in the time, place and manner in which the incident was presented to the police before her statement, although the complainant's statement found some contradictions and improvements, but the incident was reported to the commission. It was not enough to forgive. Because one of the defendants said that contradictions could be interpreted as timely errors and even the complainant was a straightforward villain and a female statement of the witness to which the accused was reasonably reliable. patent advocate from Mangowal lawyer