LIAQUAT ALI versus STATE
Definition of Section 2 302 (b) evidence was the motive behind the fact that the difference between the victim's widow's age and age was invalid because such a distinction was not important for illicit relations. Was fully supported and there is no desire or animosity to make any false allegations against the accused in this case; Even if the positive report from the Franzic Science Laboratory is kept in mind, there is still plenty of evidence. The format of the ocular testimony and its motive was available on the record so that the accused mentioned his age in the statement under section 234 statement, CRPC does not have evidence to declare him as a minor. Maybe, when he didn't even do it. His birth certificate or school leaving certificate was presented to the court with no reduction for lesser punishment. The accused was retained in jail and the death sentence of the culprits was maintained.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Warburton lawyer
