Find a Lawyer

MEHMOOD KHAN versus STATE

Sections 498 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 109 and 34 bail prior to arrest, confirming the accused was responsible for the culprit's murder 53 days before the date of the incident only by the complainant. The common allegation against them was that the criminal litigation between the parties was pending and when they learned that a complaint was filed by the complainant in the form of an FIR or report by the police If none had been made, none of the named accused was present at the meeting where a conspiracy was being made to discuss the progress. The accused accused, who was the sister of the co-accused, was not present on the occasion. No special role was designated by the accused yet it was not decided whether any of the accused was present by the accused. The role was not designated, so he killed the accused, because of the previous enmity, the complainant could not be denied, the accused could not be denied, no recovery was taken from the accused, permission to abduct the accused. Cannot be granted, it prevents the arrest of the co-accused in order to take advantage of the post-arrest warrant, If that can not be reduced on the basis that they will put the weapon and then he will apply for bail after the arrest of the accused if the case falls within. Further investigation, he could not be denied pre-arrest privileges. The bail was granted before the accused was arrested. In fact, it was confirmed. law firms from Kashmore lawyer