Find a Lawyer

IMRAN versus STATE

Sections 2?2 (b), 4?4, 7337D, 33 333 D and 34 34 were the presence of the accused at the time of the appraisal of the evidence at which the accused and the accused were present in the same case. came. The shadow of a doubt and the manner of the investigation and the suggestions presented to the accused, also supported the prosecution's case, the defense and defense aides also admitted that the defendant and the injured prosecutor's witness suffered injuries during the incident. Were. The full support of the litigation, the testimony of the witnesses, was merely, clear, convincing, and coherent, enough to record the conviction of the accused without a confrontation. Eyewitnesses were found to be pure in purity, which made their statements more credible and credible. Credits were provided with a sufficient number of credentials and confirmatory evidence that fully supported Ocular's version Medical examination report, also in the nature of diversified evidence, with the two marks indicating the recovery of the blood-stained cloth. The witnesses had fully proved that the independent witness had also endorsed the recovery of the knife used in the incident, and it was fully done. It turned out that the knife was used as a crime FTR weapon, even though he was booked seven hours after the incident, but said that the prosecution's version of the delay was not suspected. Because the person was later taken to a military hospital after death, civilians were generally not allowed to make regular visits to the Army Hospital, otherwise the accused would not benefit from the delay. inheritance advocates near Mansehra lawyer