MUHAMMAD TARIQ MAHMOOD versus STATE
Definition of Section 302 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 Evidence. The witnesses of the complainant and the prosecution were not only closely related to each other, but they were also closely related to the deceased. On the occasion of the conviction that the accused, Corner, alleged that the accused had a way to kill the victim, the prosecution had failed to prove the motive without any substance, and the weapon used to prove the crime Was not recovered and the event was not presented and nothing was going on. In order to prove that the accused was intended to be assassinated, part of the prosecution's story regarding the prosecution did not prove during the trial, in view of the strong mitigating circumstances in favor of the accused, section 302 (A) (B), cannot be punished under PPC, but its case came under section 2302 (c), PPC, which provided for a period of two years imprisonment for clarification. The extension filed by the accused against the order of conviction under Section 13 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965, was accepted and he was acquitted of the charge. But the charge of murder under Section 302, PPC was sentenced to 14 years.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Gujar Khan lawyer