Find a Lawyer

AFTAB AHMED BUTT versus BABRA RAHEEM

Article 5, Schedule and 10 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Shariah Courts Ordinance, 1982, Sections 6 and 11 filed suit for recovery of amount and dowry not filed. The defendant did not claim that the defendant had admitted the claim of the defendant. Ali's written statements did not come up. Claim entry scope As the defendant clearly stated in his written statement that if the claimant returned his jewelry, he would then be ready to pay her the dower and return her dowry, otherwise the cost of the jewelry would be deducted. After that, the rest of the money or jewelry can be given to her. The conditional written statement, thus, he could not state as admission. In the circumstances, the court had to strike in the light of the plea of the parties and thereafter proceeding in accordance with the law, but the court ordered a brief and sketch. Encountered a fatal error while recording. Hilariously, which could not be sustained, the court in its written statement also ignored the initial objections raised by the defendant in the absence of the plaintiff's signature and the plaintiff's absence from his counsel. Plaintiff's lawyer's signature on the schedule and the absence of a lawyer, the case was not sustained. In this case it was also a valid case where the court should have settled the cases and the evidence should have set a date for the court, in compliance with the decisions of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Family Court Act 1993 and the orders of the courts below. Was unsuccessful. Was set aside and accordingly necessary remand for the cases will be remanded after the necessary arrangements have been made. lawer from fb area from Trinda Mohd Pannah lawyer