Find a Lawyer

MST. NAZISH KAZMI versus SYED SHUJAAT HUSSAIN KAZMI

Section 5, Schedule and 10 (4) suits for dissolution of marriage and recovery of the Dover Trial Court after recording the evidence of both parties; The order of the suit was dismissed by the husband for the restoration of marital rights, and the trial court's order essentially forced the husband to two points. First, the trial court failed to settle matters after presenting its written statement and, in the circumstances, violated the essential provisions of the law. Second, the trial court failed to appreciate the fact that, if the divorce had occurred at the beginning of the wife without any arrangement, she was obliged to pay the full amount of the debt, rather than her failure. Regarding the first point regarding filing of the Framing Issues, under the provisions of Section 10 (4) of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Family Courts Act 1993, there was no doubt, but the formation of matters was mandatory, But from that time on, because no framing results were provided. Matters, the requirements for the provisions were not compulsory, it seemed that it was a directory in nature and the parties were not necessarily alive in this matter, they presented their evidence on their own claim and no one else was present at that time. Didn't object. In the process of presenting the cases, the trial court had in fact ruled inadmissible in the circumstances and did not appear to have any illegal or irregularities, whatever the whole ammo was about considering the case. And to worry us immigration advocates from Umer Kot lawyer