Find a Lawyer

SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB FOOD DEPARTMENT, LAHORE versus JAVED IQBAL

Section 3 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Sections 4 and 5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) Conduct of misconduct by a principle reduction in penal service tribunal, disqualification of the jurisdiction of public servants. Dismissed. And the negligence but the service tribunal changed the penalty to a reduction in the pay scale. The Definition of Words Corruption Service in Punjab (Special Powers) Ordinance, since 2000, was almost the same as that assigned to the Punjab Civil Servants. Was done Discipline) In the Rules, 1999, allegations of corruption or allegations of corruption are always regarded as more important than allegations of disqualification: The authorized authority has the power to punish a public servant in any of the punishments mentioned in the law. Punishment should be punished for the purpose of safe administration of the justice administration, depending on the severity of the crime, otherwise dealing with the matter will end its usefulness. Government employees were not guilty of mismanagement or corruption, therefore, ineligible. Or the dismissal on the charge of negligence was the extreme penalty that the service tribunal imposed on the defendant. Was less accurate. Supreme Court refuses to interfere with a decision passed by a service tribunal given to government employees by a competent authority inheritance advocates near Haroonabad lawyer