Find a Lawyer

IN RE: SUO MOTU CASE NO.1 OF 2007 (MANHANDLING OF HON\'BLE MR. JUSTICE IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY BY versus IN RE: SUO MOTU CASE NO.1 OF 2007 (MANHANDLING OF HON\'BLE MR. JUSTICE IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY BY

Article 204 Contempt of Court Ordinance (V of 2003), Section 5 Tendering of unconditional apology The effect of mandating the Chief Justice of Pakistan by policemen and also leading the capital under the nose of top police officers and administration, Chief Justice It was hard to imagine a more abusive physical force used by members of the law enforcement agency against high-ranking police officers and administrators, when police personnel resorted to using it. The physical force, therefore, failed to perform its duties, with no senior officers taking any disciplinary action against the subordinate policemen, which indicated the approval of the tender of unconditional amnesty in view of the specific circumstances of the case. What, not to work to purge the claimants of contempt, which can be regarded as a condition of mitigation, however, in the present case, considering the degree of contempt of court and the degree of their offender, Sentenced under 204, which was read with the Sections, contempt of court ordinance, although the defendant Alias' degree of criminal ability differs from the controversial ones in the current case. 2003 according to the principle \ r \ n \ r \ n best advocate from Mamu kunjan lawyer