MESSRS SHAHEEN FOODS LIMITED THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE versus REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION LIMITED THROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR
Section 6 Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finance) Ordinance (XLI of 2001) Section 13 Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O IX, R 13 Response to Notice of Service to Defendants in a Timely Suit for Receipt of Financial Assistance Only four of the nine respondents received the reply to the respondent, while the rest of the respondent's action was taken against the previous parties, no one said that the respondent was referred, because the response to the notice was rejected and The trial was dismissed, the petition moved by legal representatives of the former PEN-decree separation request. One such defendant was allowed and the defamation order was set aside because a notice was filed by the respondents' legal representatives in response to the reply, against the three parties against the remaining three accused. An action was taken and a petition for a legal record came as the trial court ruled that the dismissed party decree was filed by only one of the defendants' legal representatives, but the Chairman Banking Tribunal issued the full order Set aside The Banking Tribunal had no jurisdiction to pass the said judgment and decision, which would be considered as presented by the High Court suit, before the Banking Tribunal petitioned the financial institutions (Sec. Of Finance). ) Be directed to file a leave application under section 10 of the ordinance. , 2001 within 10 days
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
