Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus MUHAMMAD SULEMAN

Sections 12 and 42 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), AXLI, R23 Legislative Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 163 for the specific performance of the sale contract for land to declare title to the land after the suit The seller's suit is then offered to the seller after the seller announces that he or she is persuaded by such mutual fraud that if the seller has taken a special oath that he did not come to an agreement with her If so, the sale price has been received and the mutation approval has been obtained. The case should be dismissed and both the shopkeeper and the seller first be ordered that the vendor accept such an offer in the presence of the parties and take the oath, and the trial court hearing of his lawyer I excluded the incoming seller's case and then excluded the first seller and seller appeals court case in the seller's appeal. Setting aside the trial court's order and the remand case for evidence based judgment, not filing an appeal by the vendor, the remand order against the remand order main appeals from the first vendor to the subsequent vendor and vendor. The suit was decided on special oath, thus, no locals had to fight the lawsuit filed by the first vendor, which was ordered on special oath, the vendor Did not terminate the injunction in the previous case. The result of the order, according to the first seller, was that the interest of the seller in the suit area was transferred to the first seller, who had stepped into the shoe of the seller, thus, leaving Lux Standi anonymous remanded. famous lower court advocate from Skardu lawyer