Find a Lawyer

ALLIED BANK OF PAKISTAN LIMITED THROUGH MANAGER versus MESSRS SAWAN IMPEX THROUGH SOLE PROPRIETOR

The Banking Court against the plaintiff by the plaintiff dismissing the Sections 9, 10, 15 and 22 of the Specific Relief Act (of 1877), the declaration of suits 42 and 54 and the application for leave for permanent injunction It was ruled that the plaintiff was obliged to pay Rs 75,26,635 as a complete and final relief of his liabilities and the defendant bank was entitled to attract the same amount. The banking court ruled that the bankruptcy court refused to grant a leave request to defend the case, according to the record. Iyi, the plaintiff's liability was Rs.1,17,41,508 95 till 16 1 2003 and any dispute regarding its accuracy can only be settled. Defendant's defense was not denied by the plaintiff a full release from the plaintiff by the leave and for the trial, the defendant bank was aware of its determination of the obligation and the amount owed. Defendant pleaded through a leave application to defend the claim that the plaintiff's liability was Rs 1,17,41,508 95 but accordingly the plaintiff's version stated that the amount was 75,26,634 48 and said that the fact The amount against the plaintiff's approach adopted by the Banking Court was unreasonable, in fact and legally for the leave granted to the defendant in the claim and application made by the defendant bank. The grounds were guaranteed, the matter was not sought for consideration and settlement of the matter when it involved a dispute and it involved a dispute in which the money was due to the bankruptcy court's decision. The defense of this case was about to vacate for leave immigration advocates phone number from Timergara lawyer