Find a Lawyer

MST. SABIHA BEGUM THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS versus MST. UMMAT-UL-ISLAM THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS

Sections 42 and 54 of the Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), Sections 454 of the Act (Art. As a result of fraud and misrepresentation, and false for non-payment of the sale price, the trial court dismissed the suit and the pending sale appellate court's decision, but the plaintiff was awarded a sum of Rs. 100,000. The price did not prove that its legitimate sub-registrar had taken prejudicial or prejudicial behavior against all registrars before the claimant had agreed to receive Rs. 1,00,000 as the sale price. No citation could be made, the appellate court found that the sale agreement should go through the claimant in view of the provisions of Article 102 of the Martyrdom Act. Executed, 1984 could not confirm through oral evidence that his client had not been paid. The FF either claimed to have recovered the money - the plaintiff ruled in his favor by a judgment of Rs.100,000 that there was no evidence to show that the value of his property was It was granted by the appellate court through an appellate court decision. The absence of evidence could not sustain the judgment and the appellate court's order directing the plaintiff to pay the plaintiff Rs 10,000.00 was improper; Given \ r \ n \ r \ n how to become a advocate from Mirpur Khas lawyer