TEHSIL MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION/TEHSIL COUNCIL, NAUSHERA VIRKAN, DISTRICT GUJRANWALA THROUGH NAZIM versus MST. ZUBAIDA BEGUM
A. XXVI, R 9 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Report of Appointment of Local Commissioner in Section 8 Suite The suit related to the requirements of the local commissioner alleges that the plaintiff was the owner of a 12-march land in the specific measles number. Was captured. Despite the defendant's and the limitation report in which the transgressions were reflected, defendant denied that the defendant's suit had been decided by the trial and the appellate court together with the defendant. Said that it had revised against the harmonization decisions and orders, which were set aside for the appointment of both the decision and the local commissioner, which strictly limits the land according to the rules of the High Court (Lahore). And after the remand the local commissioner of orders was appointed, who filed his report and based on it Have been the order of the hearing. The basic requirement for proper delimitation by the trial court and the appellate court was that the local commissioner should seek the field map (akjar or luth) produced during the final settlement and that the land should be measured in respect of the said document report. At the same time, the statement of the local commissioner in the present case was quite silent. Regarding how they performed the measurements, no attempt was made by the local commissioner to determine any other points as the High Court had directed, and as the local commissioner's High Court did. Did not meet the criteria set forth in the report's rules and regulations. The order based on the report of the local commissioner approved by the appellate court was set aside and remanded in this case.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Kashmore lawyer