SHAMSHAD HUSSAIN versus SPECIAL JUDGE, ANTI-TERRORISM COURT, GUJRANWALA
Article 6 and 7 of the Constitutional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application Twenty-six (26) attackers during the day to declare the mosque to attack the complaining party One person died and three () were injured as a result of accusations from all sides on the complaining party directly after the shooting. There was a constitutional request from the Anti-Terrorism Court to move the case to a court of common jurisdiction that the incident was based on enmity between the parties and the accused never intended. Mass terrorism or intimidation of the public If the suspects want to limit the impact or fear of the aggressor to their attack, they will publicly disclose their intentions with the intention of going to the mosque. Do not go to the mosque to snake. The house of God) was nothing but terrorizing the people before such attacks, the purpose of the accused to commit such incidents was to spread terror and terror throughout the city, terrorism. And creating a disturbing effect was a public place where the people or the Ummah had free access. The High Court had dismissed the constitutional application on such matters as the provision of Section 6 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
