Find a Lawyer

MIR BADSHAH QAISRANI versus STATE

Section 498 Preamble Code (XLV of 1860), bail before section 302, denial of a pre-arrest bail, was an arbitrary relief that could be granted under extraordinary circumstances while giving such person relief. Behavior was also to be considered. In the present case, the accused twice obtained a security arrest warrant from the High Court, approached the court for the first time, obtained interim pre-arrest bail, and then absent himself, even though he had said that he was forcibly sentenced to court. I was prevented from appearing, but when applying for pre-arrest bail, the accused did not face hardship, saying that in the history of the trial court when the accused was not ready to bail, he was without interruption. Easily departed from the court, the accused did not knowingly choose to appear in court when the court granted him bail. Services had been fixed for the accused to show that such behavior is hide the extraordinary jurisdiction of the court. Session for pre-arrest bail approval could not be used in favor of accused, application for approval of pre-arrest bail was dismissed female advocates from Sikandarabad lawyer