MAJOR (R) SHAKIL-UD-DIN AHMED versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, ISLAMABAD
Section 21 (7) of the Islamabad Rent Restriction Ordinance 2001, using the jurisdiction under the jurisdiction of the appellate court, was not required to send a record to the appellate court against the order to dismiss the appeal of the rent controller and It will depend on these facts. In each case, if the appellate court finds it necessary, after dismissing the record, it can give the parties the opportunity and decide the appeal, which will mean that there are two types of cases that will appear before the appellate court. Will In the first category, where the facts were simple and they were not disputed, the first appeal was usually dismissed and the rent controller's record was not required, while the second category was, if the facts were not simple. Or controversial first appeal was generally not excluded. In this case the appellate court will send for the record, giving the appellant an opportunity to be heard. And in this case the Appellate Authority will not dismiss the appeal without sending the record before the Rent Controller and the hearing parties. And if necessary, make such further inquiries as it is deemed appropriate for the first time to call for the record and in the latter case the appellate authority could not exclude the appeal in limine. \ R \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from Laliah lawyer