Section 302 (b) and 511 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), the testimony of the accused in the testimony of Section 7 evidence said that the accused was admitted to the hospital on the day of the incident, but this aspect of the case Was not exposed. The notice of trial court evidence should have been brought to the notice of the High Court by the accused's lawyer. He should have been brought on record by the trial court, but at the relevant time, the information was never kept before the court, according to the High Court. The source was taken on remand to the trial court with the observation that the trial court would record the statement of the relevant doctors as a court witness who allegedly examined the accused on the day of the incident. Prepare a medico legal report and if an investigating officer or any other witness is required to make a fair decision on the matter and thereafter, after bringing the latest record of the accused under Section 2342, CRPC, Resh to decide the matter
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
