Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus AFTAB HAIDER

According to preliminary results prepared by the Article 9 Election Presiding Officer for the NALC script, the applicant's closure was the highest scorer, thus the result was not officially announced by the returning officer. Chose to record the papers, which resulted in voting in favor of 619 votes. The applicant was excluded on the request that no official mark (codal mark) was placed on the back of the ballot papers by the respective polling officers, consequently the respondent was declared as Notification. , The applicant had filed an election before the Election Tribunal stating that 619 voting stations in five polling stations were deprived of the right to elect their preferred representatives and that the polling staff had failed to apprehend any wrongdoing or wrongdoing by the appellant. As well as the voters did not suffer, another election candidate The R also filed an election petition in which the election process was completely rejected during the filing of the petitioner's respondent's resignation followed by the resignation which was approved by the competent authority's Election Tribunal. The petitioner was declared to be the runner-up for the seat of the NALC Tribunal as the appeal was terminated by the Chief Justice to the extent of the applicant's declaration while he was resigned. The Election Tribunal accepted the applicant's electoral plea bargaining limit, so almost one year after the leave of appeal for appeal against the Chief Justice's decision. top civil advocates from Sangla Hill lawyer