Find a Lawyer

SAJJAD ALI versus MST. MAH PARI

The appreciation of the provisions of Sections 302 (b) and 458 of the evidence was not sufficient to prove the accused against the accused, especially when the complainant's statement was highly credible in the present case and the trial The court allegedly tried to convict and convict the accused was also mistaken, the complainant and the other prosecutor's witness who was the grandson of the complainant were disputed, and medical evidence was denied and the site planned. There was no motive and no prosecution for the crime. There was no incident against him because the alleged FIR was not lodged at the police station and it was generally believed that in such a situation, it was likely that counseling under the FIR was conducted. And after the consideration was registered. On the occasion of the complaining party and preliminary inquiry by the police, on the occasion of the availability of spectacular witnesses, considerable suspicion was found. The verdict of numerous legal and factual weaknesses and the trial court did not prove beyond any doubt. The suspect was involved in the crime, medical evidence was in the nature of proof of proof, it could not be considered contradictory evidence can be considered as evidence of the accused's conviction and could be recovered from the spot during the investigation. The accused is not evidence of an indictment against Crime Amputees, the finding Fire arm's expert was not sent to anyone whether it was fired. Were charged with weapons or a very high power / bulge, satisfaction best advocate from Hangu lawyer