Find a Lawyer

STATE versus RAZA KHAN

Claims 9 and 25 increase the value of the evidence The accused pleading guilty to extension of sentence was convicted and sentenced to ten years in prison. The RI sought an increase in the sentence awarded to the accused by the trial court in their request for review, all of the prosecution's witnesses agreed. All the elaborate features of this case and their statements give rise to all the colors of the facts. There was no available reason to refute their testimony. The defendant's lawyer failed to identify if there was any background of bitterness or ill-will between the recovery witnesses and the accused, so that the witness could be falsely implicated in such a case, Large quantities of prohibited marijuana and opium were recovered from the report gateways from Chemical Suspect Report. The investigator on samples of recovered material, identified as being in positive contradiction, was not expensive and the CCP magistrate on the main drug rehabilitation charge under Section 25 of the Anti-Drug Prevention Act 1997 According to the law, the confessional statements of the accused were recorded. In the capacity of the carrier, although they were not taken before the trial court, under the law, the High Court may consider the application, if it derives from the evidence presented by the prosecution. does. The trial court will disclose that it was specifically stated in the confessional statements made by the accused persons that they were poor laborers and to act as a carrier for the main principle accused. jobs for advocates from Barkhan lawyer