Find a Lawyer

RAHMAN GUL versus NIZAKAT BIBI

Section 5 and Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 constitutional jurisdiction to dissolve High Court scope suit, partiality of marriage, restoration of dowry articles and suit was partially decided by family court, petitioner Filed a constitutional petition against the verdict. The Family Court's affirmation of the High Court was, in nature, completely arbitrary and could be denied in appropriate cases when using the constitutional jurisdiction, the High Court. It has to be seen, if the tribunal or court acts without any jurisdiction or Noon violates or the law could not proceed to re-examine the evidence in such cases and as the appellate court is hearing from its subordinate court, the appellate court is to examine the evidence and according to the law there is no bail in the case. No rule or judicial error has occurred. The case was referred by the lawyer inviting H's intervention to the court, court's online records have shown that after the marriage, the spouse was treated as a result of the mistreatment of the applicant and his parents. Relations between the two were not pleasant, causing the defendant to leave the applicant's home and stay at his parents' home. The petitioner was paid by the petitioner and the articles of the plaintiff were in the possession of the petitioner through the evidence in the judgment file supporting the judgment and the Family Court order and hardly sought the intervention of the High Court in the constitutional jurisdiction. had gone property advocate from Sialkot lawyer