Find a Lawyer

FAZAL KARIM KHAN versus EID MUHAMMAD

For the specific performance of the contract sale contract in favor of the plaintiff by the Section 12 attorney, the principal challenged on the basis that the contract was drafted after the Power of Attorney was terminated because Ounce was the plaintiff. Because the contract in question was within the period when the attorney was in force and was not canceled by the defendant / principal plaintiff, on the basis of which he presented his evidence that he had to sell The agreement was found by the trial court that, for some reason, it could not be considered that the contract was made under the agreement. The date of implementation was not double written but was made on the due date for the completion of the contract and there was no alliance to promote the deal. Defending Defendant / Administrator There was a matter between the principal and his lawyer and former lawyer. Seeking appropriate action against the latter immigration advocates email from Badin lawyer