Find a Lawyer

TAHIR RASHID versus STATE

Section 948 Constitution FIN Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The inquiry into the termination of the orders of the Constitutional Petitions was already initiated and the FIR revocation report relied solely on the respondents / accused party's version. Was developed which was under consideration. Issued only as a guarantee of the person who dealt with the complainant / applicant was issued in favor of the applicant by the defendant in the dispute, which was presented to the bank twice. , But each time his dishonor due to non-availability of funds and instability proved to be a crime under Section 489F, PPC, whether the check in the dispute was issued as a guarantee or a loan The need for payment or recording of evidence was toward the fulfillment of an obligation and it was the court's duty to decide whether any factor existed. The magistrate did not agree to the police report mechanically by the Czech administration through a straightforward order and did not apply the court's mind to consider the facts of the case even though it was an executive order, but to the magistrate. The Speaking Order was to be passed and he was not obliged by any police opinion to agree with the same police. The court magistrate did not properly exercise its jurisdiction, which declared the invalid order illegal and without any jurisdiction, the High Court was able to interfere with it, accepting the constitutional petition. And the defamation order was set aside, with which the remand case will be directed. To the Magistrate, who, following the cancellation report top civil advocates from Domeli lawyer