M. KHURRAM MUGGO versus MST. PERVEEN HAMEED MUGGO
A. VII, R 11 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 127 suit declaration limitation could not be established on the basis of pursuant to the plaintiff that he had any right ? There was no application in the case of the Limitation Act, 1908, in the shares of the Company or any other asset referred to in the Plaintiff, which could be called joint family ownership, from which it was excluded under Article 127. There was to be a 12-year calculation in that date, when in the present case, the learned transfer of the shareholder was discharged from the agreement, he was executed on 21 1992 1992 and it was not the case of the plaintiff that he was unaware of it. , So the present case brought by the plaintiff on 6 2 2006 was beyond the time provided by Article 127 of the Limitation Act, 1908
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Umer Kot lawyer
