MUHAMMAD ILYAS versus STATE
Section 497 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 bail, revealed that the deceased had been killed by the accused and his accomplice, his body was kept in a car and taken to his village. The FIR was immediately recorded about an hour and twenty minutes after it was thrown into a field, the suspect, who was armed with a rifle, was listed in the FIR and his death. As a result, the victim was named in the role of the witnesses. The incident was registered with the police under Section 161, CCPC, according to eyewitness accounts of the further connection of the accused prosecution case as the number of suspects has been reported to have sustained severe injuries. , However, was found innocent in the meantime. An inquiry was made by the police, but before disagreement with the magistrate, a report of the substance was presented, which attempted to show that the police had reached a conclusion, did not. The challan was submitted to the trial court under a valid or durable law and it is likely that in the near future his death sentence will begin to prove a punishable offense, in view of the evidence on record, it can be safely said. That there was sufficient evidence on record that the commission's suspect in the murder of the deceased bull, in these circumstances, was acquitted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Neelam lawyer