Find a Lawyer

STATE versus KASHIF ALI

Section 497 (5) Control of Narcotic Substances (XXV of 1997), Sections 6, 7, 8, 9 and 25, the basis for the cancellation of the bail, was given to the accused that the prosecutor failed to legitimize private witnesses. The detective received information at odd hours of the night (30:30 am) when private witnesses could not be arranged, unless otherwise the provisions of Section 103, CR PC were not attracted to the airport. Was recovered and under Section 25 of the Control of Narcotic. The provisions of the Drugs Act, 1997, Section 103, CRPC were not applied in any of the Anti-Drugs Act 1997, private persons for various reasons and especially such cases at airports. I do not come forward to be a witness. The evidence in the case of bail was not valid and the points could have been properly disposed of at the trial. Staying in jail for a period of only two months is reason for believing the reasonable grounds that the accused is involved in the case, no justification was granted to the trial court to grant the accused bail. Was set aside and a request to cancel the bail was granted, patent advocate from Pir Mahal lawyer