Find a Lawyer

SYED IMTIAZ H. RIZVI versus ABDUL WAHAB

A II, R 2, O VII & R 11 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), declaration of section 42 suit and filing second suit for damages were disclosed in the proceedings, which was the basis of the earlier case. , But the relief they received in each of the two suits was different provisions of O II, R 2, CPC provided that the plaintiff was not allowed to take any relief later in the case from which he could have been. The reason for the action in the subsequent suit sought in the previous case will be restrained due to the fact and the fact that the relief sought in both suits was different, had no legal consequence, The present case was in accordance with the subsequent case and for that reason. , O II, R2, C2C, O2 was not enforceable under the provisions of Rule 2, dividing the CPC claims and remedies arising from one party against the other. Was created to prevent a plaintiff from committing a breach of contract, commitment or obligation, then several reliefs arising from such infringement could not be allowed so that a The purpose of obtaining remedies in more than one action was to prevent more than one action from the plaintiff. The defendant, for the same reason of action; and if he ceased to receive any relief in any proceeding, then, in the case of O II, R 2, CPC, he was relieved of relief. , Which was later dropped in the action bar under O II, R2, CPC. Since the relief sought in the suit was also banned in this case, the switch was made best law firm from Bhara Kahu lawyer