Find a Lawyer

PAK SUZUKI MOTOR COMPANY LTD. THROUGH SR. GENERAL MANAGER (I&LP), KARACHI versus SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MEMBER CUSTOMS, ISLAMABAD

Section 33 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition for Claims for Return of Service Charges Claims 128 Refund Claims, which are pending without any progress, the applicant filed a constitutional petition and The High Court directed the authorities to resolve the applicants' claims within two months. Applicant did not decide within two months, the petitioner filed a petition for contempt of court authorities, while rejecting all the claims of the applicant on behalf of the applicant before the customs, excise and sales tax appellate tribunal. Appeal was filed after allowing three appeals, the Authority was directed to decide the applicant's affairs within 30 days on merit, even after the Tribunal's claims were pending. Has filed a complaint with the Federal Tax Ombudsman in connection with the remaining uncontested claims that will eventually be dismissed. After the review petition, the presence of the applicant constitutional petition was challenged on the basis that the applicant did not avail himself of the legal means before filing the constitutional petition, the order of the Appellate Tribunal Independent. On the law's point of view, a suitable reference application could be submitted to the High Court. The unlawful transfer of justice by the appellate / tribunal in this case was made clear by the fact that in the preliminary litigation cases, the appellate tribunal rejected the orders passed by the Additional Collector Customs ordering the applicant's additional collector's order. Can be filed challenging advocate from Darya Khan lawyer