RAFI-UD-DIN versus MANAGING DIRECTOR, SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINES LIMITED, LAHORE
About 4 and a half years after filing an appeal against the dismissal of the Section 4 Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1973, Rr 3 and 4, it was filed that they could not appeal to the service tribunal. Because they filed a constitutional petition. In the High Court against the dismissal order, being a civil servant, the appellant was required to file an appeal in the service court tribunal wrongfully chosen by the appellant, the benefit of his negligence could not be granted, even constitutional. The petition was filed by the appellant after three years, after the dismissal of his employment and three and a half years after the present appeal was filed, the appellant could not be shown any indication. The appeal was dismissed due to time restriction.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Hub Inds Estate lawyer
