Find a Lawyer

DR. IMRAN MASOOD versus ZONAL HEAD (G&P) STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN, LAHORE ZONE, LAHORE AND 2 OTHERS

The Regulation 22 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), the order to terminate the service appeal restoration restitution benefits settlement order appellant's services, was set aside by the service tribunal in the appeal and the appellant was entitled to back benefits. It was ordered to reinstate the service as it was given to the appellant by the Back Benefits Service Tribunal, after the payment was not made, the appellant had to file an appeal relief presented by the appellant because the authority. The same was already applied to the other employee by the same employer, but the appellant was asked to make a distinction. Was locked up and denied that the relief effect was appellant. Treatment with another employee is similarly entitled to a pre-approved decision by the service tribunal, treating it as a pay leave without interruption, a violation of the department's previous benefits. Was made, this would include consideration of annual increments, bonus payments and advances. And all these benefits were rejected by the appellant, in this way there was absolutely no intention of the service tribunal accepting the appeal and giving it a clear verdict, the department was instructed to pay salary grant for the interim period. To decide on the claim of the appellant and other benefits which are legally binding will also be given to the appellant. advocate from Wan Radha Ram lawyer