Find a Lawyer

KHADAM HUSSAIN versus MUHAMMAD AZAM SATI

Section 12 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), deciding the specific performance of the section 42 suit agreement, affirming and re-presenting the decision on the basis of the oath. Appeal was filed against the appellant, the same counsel for the appellant, on the eve of the appeal, offered that if the defendant had taken oath from the Quran that he had bought the suit land after paying the consideration amount. , Then he will not pressurize his appeal after accepting the offer stated in the affidavit as he did in the plaintiff's High Court / Appellate Court S statement was based on a statement, deleted appeal had been filed in the Supreme Court against the High Court decision, take a decision on the case was more powerful. When the offer was accepted by the parties as compared to any other type of decision, they could not refrain from such an offer. The binding force will be contracted and in this case the approval and correction principle will be applied in full force. property advocates from Lala rukh lawyer