The SS, 302, 324 and 34 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 prosecution had established its case on important issues through impressive evidence of trust, the names of the accused were mentioned in the FIR and The witnesses had clearly dismissed the suspect. The prosecution's story that led to his death was based primarily on the statements of witnesses who had clearly dispelled the details of the incident through deceased statements and other evidence that led to the defense. For a technicality lawyer, he argued, he too could not be excluded. At key points of the prosecution's case, the prosecutor was able to prove that the names of the witnesses in the FLR were found to be specific names of the accused, which led to the death of the accused by the victim. The use of deadly weapons was fully proven through prosecution statements. The testimony of the deceased eyewitnesses of the incident was confirmed, the med real reports, the injection sheet and other controversial material prosecution case proved to be the most important points, the only accused against the co-accused was to carry a loaded gun from his house. And handed him over to the accused, who was his older brother and nothing more. In the prosecution's story, the co-accused did not persuade his brother to shoot him. The co-accused used the gun without a gun, the PPC did not attract the principal suspect, who was repeatedly punished by Section 34 law. And the trial court rightly sentenced the accused to three years imprisonment, otherwise, there was no evidence on record.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
