Section 114 and O XLVII, R1 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Supreme Court Rules, 1978; The decision of the question will not be justified by the court's inability to review the wrong or illegitimate basis on the basis of one's abilities. The greatness of a person is to realize and correct his error, But not to make a dignity issue and to insist on it, he felt that no question was decided illegally or by imposing it, then his main duty was to use the wrong juice. Ltd must reform and whenever he took refuge in God for forgiveness and know that it is through no fault of his. Because of the basic duty of all parties to review their misconduct, the administration of justice will be obliged to ignore rules of law or procedures that do not serve its primary purpose, but rather enjoy it. The Supreme Court's moral and legal obligation to obstruct or obstruct the path of justice was to ensure the delivery of full justice with each and every case if any issue / question decided by the Supreme Court was unlawfully resolved. If it is found then refusing to review it would be to negate the principles of justice, i.e. to do injustice. R
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
