Find a Lawyer

ABDUL GHAFOOR versus MUHAMMAD AJAIB KHAN

Under Section 426 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 308A punishment for the suspended applicant / accused was punished under Section 308A, PPC, except under section (2). He was sentenced to 10 years in prison. Section 382B, CRPC records have revealed that the accused had been in jail for more than 6 years and if he had been detained during that period, he would have been convicted by the trial court. Was excluded, the period of imprisonment for a further 2/3 years for the payment of a ditto, which could be given to an offender, was three years and the trial court recorded his decision to keep him in jail for non-payment. Failed to set a duration. In the appropriate case in which the applicant was entitled to be released on bail until a final settlement of the appeal of the Dwight High Court sentence, he would be hanged if the appellate court finally affirmed it, which failed. After that the accused had to escape punishment. Even in the same jail, the entire amount of Diyat was paid as long as the accused could also be recovered from his property after the death of the accused. The request for suspension of punishment was allowed and accordingly the applicant was granted bail. Was ordered to be released. law websites from Quaidabad lawyer