GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. THROUGH COLLECTOR D.I. KHAN versus MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM KHAN
The lawsuit for Articles 42 and 54 54 and for a permanent injunction granted the claimant a road construction contract to the plaintiff who was a government contractor who was contracted under a contract between the parties and the plaintiff executes the contract and the contract / contract. It was paid accordingly. Road roller charges were not received from the contractor as per the audit party's stated formula, the Executive Engineer instructed the Plaintiff to pay the Road Roller Charges to the Plaintiff, challenging the order of permanent injunction that the Recovery Trial Court At this trial and below, the appellate court dismissed the appeal filed by the petitioner against the judgment and decree of the trial court, on the basis of the audit object, the plaintiff could not be recovered because the audit object was a matter of audit officers and the plaintiff. To be decided between departments. The plaintiff had no recourse to the trial, and the houses were deemed to be in favor of the plaintiff and the appellate court dismissed the appeal against the trial court's decision and order. The present results of the following court were not subject to any kind of illegal interference by the High Court or interference with the content.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from Pindi Bhattian lawyer