Find a Lawyer

MIRA JAN versus STATE

Sections 88, 89, and 561 of the Penal Code (XLV of 1860), restitution of the property belonging to Sections 302, 324, 148 and 149 limited the accused who was involved in the criminal case, was released for a considerable period under section 88 , Action was taken against the CCPC and the order to attach the land was approved, the accused surrendered himself to the court and he was arrested. He was tried and acquitted, after which, after his victory, he applied for the release of his land, but the Judicial Magistrate dismissed his plea and also dismissed the appeal against the magistrate's decision. The occupied land remained with the accused during the alleged period. His fugitive land was not practically enclosed on the spot, and the accused remained in his physical possession during the alleged abduction, so he could not find the adjoining suspect. Information about the order has been received and this fact is irrelevant. The disclosure of the application by the accused for the restoration of the enclosed land under section 89, CR PCC was within one time only, because the refusal of the enclosed property was denied which the accused fled in a criminal case. Was finally acquitted, totally invalid and against all principles of justice, because of the plea, the attached land was ordered to be released in favor of the applicant. advocate for immigration from Shahpur Chakar lawyer