Find a Lawyer

NAWAB KHAN versus RABIA NASEER

Failure to file a written statement to CPC, failure to intercept defensive attack, attack under O VIII, R 10 & O VII, R 11 object O VIII, CPC Petition O VII, R 11 10, because the CPC failed to present its written statement to the defendants, the trial court as well as the Court of Appeal overruled that the complaint was filed by the defendants under O. VII, R11, CPC. Important questions of law were raised in the petition and in its interest, justice, the trial court, can act as a written statement of competence. No doubt, under the eighth, certain conditions were provided to the CPC. The filing statement should be complete when filing, but the object behind it was that the defendant, like the plaintiff, should clearly disclose his / her case / defense and put it in clear words before the court so that the opposing party can know the defense. ? And that appropriate cases were set up to record the supporting and contradictory evidence so that the trial could be easily and within the prescribed parameters the court's own authority to treat any miscellaneous request as a written statement. Was not declined if it raised important questions about the law or. In the present case, the trial court was not only competent, but also under the obligation to submit the application as a written statement under OVII, R 11, CPC, the facts which could be reduced in the cases, by both the courts. Had neglected the invaluable principle of justice. At the same time, the scope of the law was used on the issue, leading to a misunderstanding of justice. Decisions and orders were set aside and the trial proceeded best law firm from Kohat lawyer