Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ZAHID PERVAIZ versus MUHAMMAD SHAFQAT IQBAL

Sections 6 and 13 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O XXXX, Rr 1 & 2 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 23 pre-trial case, temporary injunction, grant of injunctive order which did not lightly approve of suit property Go The claim of a bare land and the plaintiff / former rights self-determination is to prevent its owner / claimant from improving his property until the final decision on the matter, even if the previous owner has already owned his The right of copyright has been established, yet the property owner cannot be restricted from using his property, which may be a violation of his fundamental right as listed under Article 23 of the Constitution, However, a previous ownership case has been filed. Any property that is a superstructure, which is a part of the sale and the seller intends to demolish the superstructure to defeat the right to substitute the seller, the court may grant a grant based on the facts of the case. Can In the present case, the injunction sought to prevent the defendant from improving his property by increasing the construction of the shop, noting that in this way, the plaintiff's access to the land would be constrained to some extent, nor would the plaintiff Could not substantiate the claim. The suit did not constitute any right of easement from the land nor any responsibility of the shopkeeper to extend the construction on the property which he had legally purchased from the High Court, under the circumstances. , Refuses to interfere in denial Plaintiffs rule ineffective order \ r \ n \ r \ n property advocates from Miran Shah lawyer