ALI MUHAMMAD versus WALI MUHAMMAD
Section 24 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Section 21 and 96 Filing a Case With the jurisdiction of the court to file a case against the plaintiff, the Punjab suite was handed over to the civil court, which was set up at the district headquarters in the province. Excluded Punjab from zero. The Tehsildar of the Tehsil Headquarters and Patwari are the plaintiffs in the light of the defendants. The District Judge transferred the case to the Civil Court at the Tehsil Headquarters by administrative order, which ordered the Additional District Judge to file a case at the Tehsil Headquarters. On this matter, he could not be heard in the tehsil headquarters and accordingly the matter was sent to the district headquarters at the district headquarters to be handed over to a competent civil judge at the district headquarters. It was ruled under Section 24 of the Pakistan Civil Court Ordinance, 1962. There is no express bar in the law against litigation against public officers. E-Parties will run the case because of a special law, 1962, apart from the headquarters of the District West Pakistan Civil Courts Ordinance and have jurisdiction. Regarding section 21, the Code of Conduct will abolish the general provisions of 1908, not available for protection of proceedings at the CPC headquarters; no exception can be taken regarding the impugned order of the Additional District Judge Act of Court. , Although neither party should be subject to prejudice, the courts have their powers The powers that be were governed in terms of jurisdiction. The law and even the consent of the parties and a wrong order of the court for this matter will not grant jurisdiction.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Quetta lawyer