Find a Lawyer

MIAN NISAR ELAHI versus LAHORE STOCK EXCHANGE(G) LIMITED

Sections 11, 12 and 8 (5) Suite Wide Section 11, Central Depository Act, 1997 The plaintiff's case was that the Central Depository Company had allowed the stock exchange to use its call option and thereby, in front of all accounts. The mortgaged shares were allowed to be withdrawn. Violations of the orders passed by the Security Exchange Commission of Pakistan and despite the High Court's correctness and order to allow the plaintiff Central Depository Company to exercise its contractual authority on the stock exchange in the present case. Was. , Which acted deliberately against the Central Depository Company, not only did the Central Depository Company take unlawful action in transferring the mortgaged shares from the plaintiffs' sub-account, which violated Section 11, the Central Depositories Act of 1997. Had also worked under negligence and had a bookmark. The securities of entry to a sub-account may likewise apply if it does not agree on a treaty. The fact about the securities registered in any book from its sub-account is that the Central Depository Company has entered the sub-account of the plaintiffs. The agreement was filed, under section 11, the Central Depositories Act 1997 has no effect on the plaintiff's right to refer to the High Court. Claim losses advocates from Mian Walli lawyer