Find a Lawyer

MAKARWAL COLLIERIES LTD. THROUGH CHAIRMAN versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY, INDUSTRIES, MINES AND MINERALS DEPARTMENT, LAHORE

R52 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Mining banned the lender / lease from raising royalty rates which the five miners who were leasing were paying royalty followed by royalty. The rates were amended / increased and it was stated that although the increase was reported and published in the official Gazette of the Government, the Directorate did not legally inform the client about the better prices to the applicant for payment of dues. The notices were issued and they were fined for failure to pay royalties at increased rates. , But protested the fine and requested an apology. The applicant's request was deemed valid. Not only did the applicants pay a royalty difference, but the amount punished under the protest was also compensated under R52 (2) of Punjab. Mining concession rolls for non-payment of rent and royalty dues as a non-payment of 1986 when he was paying, although the department's participatory approach to the old rates was also accepted as he paid the royalty petitioner's old rates. Had continued to accept, the situation could not be zoned with obstruction and instability. Worked with good faith and paid dues immediately upon notification, was not liable for fines immigration advocates email from Bhan Saeedabad lawyer