Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ZIA versus STATE

Section 302/34 Defining the Evidence Evidence The suspect's affidavit, which was recorded seven days after his arrest, could not be trusted otherwise the defendant's original confessional statement was not available nor was there any quarterly report. An explanation of this can be offered. How the original documents were presented with the original copies, which were not exhibited, the Investigation Agency did not issue any article of the accused's possession, in its statement under section 342 of the material questions of the accused. Not disclosed, CRP confession statement, the basis of the conviction sentenced to the accused did not prove to be correct as the accused involved the accused in the commission of the crime, while the co-accused was killed in the absence of direct evidence. The case was compiled due to circumstantial evidence. The chain needed to be linked to another chain Prosecution C failed to prove, based on the evidence, the defendant was mysteriously shrouded in rigor, suspicion and suspicion free of all kinds. Excuse confession cannot be used as a crime. If only one situation arises in doubt, it will be sufficient to increase the benefit of the doubt. After being acquitted in favor of the accused, he stayed and was taken away by the suspect criminal advocate from Ugoki lawyer