AKHTAR MUNEER versus GENERAL TYRE AND RUBBER CO. OF PAKISTAN LTD.
Sections 46 and 47 (3) of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII 1968), Section O15 (3) (h) dismissal of employment on grounds of misconduct dismissed appellant / employee on corruption grounds. The allegation against the appellant was that he entered the senior manager's office, used extremely objectionable and non-parliamentary language and attempted to physically attack him. The appellant was given a charge sheet and nothing was brought on the record after the inquiry was dismissed. Even remotely, the inquiry officer was biased in any way or a copy of the inquiry proceedings was provided to the harassed appellant and he did not file a written complaint against the inquiry officer in which it was alleged. His statement was not fully recorded or another reason was not issued. A legal requirement was sufficient before the Inquiry Officer to make a charge against the content appellant and such finder. The Inquiry Officer's G cannot be changed without any solid material. The inquiry officer's search can only be done. , If it was reached or distorted due to the misrepresentation of evidence, the content questions will not be allowed to be presented to the witness by the appellant. The Labor Court properly rejected the appellant's complaint, there was no issue of dismissal because of this, the decision passed by the Labor Court did not guarantee interference. r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Makli lawyer